RUSH (Routine Universal Screening for HIV)

The RUSH intervention facilitates linkage to and retention in care through an opt-out HIV testing program for people 16 and older who are in an emergency department or other clinical setting and have an intravenous line inserted and/or have blood drawn.

Summary

Resumen

About the Project

Priority Population: General Population (Ages 16 and Older)

Setting: Emergency Departments, Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Clinics

Location: Houston, TX

Intervention Focus: Linkage, Re-engagement, and Retention

Study Period: 2008-2012

Outcomes, Components, Cost Analysis

Outcomes

  • 47.1% of clients were actively retained in care six months after implementation.
  • Clients’ viral suppression rate increased from 22.8% pre-intervention to 34% post-intervention.

Intervention Components

  • Address Staffing and Workflow Needs
  • Secure Organizational Buy-In
  • Establish a Steering Committee 
  • Determine Funding Streams
  • Recruit Additional Staff
  • Develop Promotional Materials
  • Train ED Staff on RUSH Procedures
  • Implement and Sustain RUSH

Cost Analysis

The RUSH intervention cost analysis is not currently available. However, you can use the CIE Cost Calculator to create an estimate of the cost of implementing the intervention at your organization.

Challenges and Solutions
ChallengeSolution
Lack of buy-inIdentify a champion within your organization who can promote it to leadership. Highlight the benefits of implementing RUSH.
Lack of off-hours service linkage worker (SLW) coverageExpand after-hours SLW coverage or hire an SLW who is dedicated to following up with clients who are not linked to care after receiving an HIV diagnosis.
Staff turnover and ongoing RUSH trainingDevelop a strategy for disseminating RUSH training to new staff, including building institutional knowledge by coaching RUSH-focused staff, who can in turn train new staff.
Lack of diverse RWHAP fundingAssess the availability of RWHAP Part A funding during the planning phase so you can strategize ways to offset costs if that funding is not available. Discuss repurposing existing funding; petition leadership for more sustainable funding; partner with agencies that have RWHAP funding or other diverse funding streams.
HIV testing lawsLearn from organizations that have implemented similar interventions to identify approaches that may be effective in your jurisdiction. Also, learn about testing laws in other jurisdictions that promote access to routine opt-out HIV testing.
Center for Innovation and Engagement

We'd like your feedback

Was this page helpful?
I found this page helpful because the content on the page:
Check all that apply
I did not find this page helpful because the content on the page:
Check all that apply
Please include an email address if you would like a response
Please include an email address if you would like a response
Did you use this approach in your work?
Not yet because
If no, why not?