A number of RWHAP Part A Planning Councils/Planning Bodies (PC/PBs) have had good experiences with some aspects of remote meetings – participation by members who live or work in more distant parts of the jurisdiction, have disabilities, or face extreme traffic congestion has in some cases improved during the COVID-19 emergency. PC/PBs have learned how to conduct such meetings successfully and have arranged connectivity for members to allow remote participation. Once the current emergency situation has ended, some PC/PBs may want to continue to hold some meetings remotely or to allow “hybrid” meetings, where some members are physically present but others participate remotely.
State Open and Remote Meeting Laws
About the Table
Many state open meeting laws were passed decades ago, before the age of the internet. They are silent on remote meetings or assume that the only options are either telephone conference calls or the use of video conferencing centers. Some states have amended their open meeting laws so they now address electronic meetings; in other states, guidance from the Attorney General or court decisions show how such issues have been litigated – although that information is not always readily available online. Nearly all states suspended open meetings laws during the COVID-19 public health emergency, usually through Executive Orders from the Governor or rulings from the Attorney General. A few states allow fully remote meetings under normal conditions, so no action was required. Some other states have built-in provisions allowing remote meetings when a state is under an official state of emergency due to a public health crisis or other disaster.
This table uses available data to summarize state requirements, limits, and conditions for fully remote meetings and for “hybrid” meetings. It addresses issues such as the following:
- Whether “all-remote” meetings are permitted. Legislation can simply forbid this, but all remote meetings may be impossible because of a less obvious requirement, such as:
- Requiring a physical location for every meeting where the public can go to observe and (sometimes) participate – usually with the Chair or at least one member present; or
- Requiring that members be physically present to count towards quorum and to vote.
- What proportion of members may connect remotely. Some states require that a majority or a quorum of members be physically present at the normal meeting place.
- Situations in which a member may participate remotely. Sometimes no reason is required, but in some states, a member may participate electronically only due to health issues (sometimes with documentation from a physician required), military service, or other limited reasons.
- How often a member may participate remotely. A few states limit the number of times a year a member may connect remotely.
- Other requirements or limitations that require attention or may make remote meetings challenging. For example, one state requires that every remote location used must be announced and accessible to the public, even if it is a member’s home or office — probably a throwback to when those remote locations were video conferencing centers. Some states require that all votes be by roll call when anyone connects remotely. Some make a distinction between teleconferencing (audio only) and videoconferencing (video and audio). One state allows public bodies to charge members of the public for costs of connecting; another forbids such charges.
- Differences between state and local bodies. Some states allow state agencies to have remote or hybrid meetings but do not allow local bodies to do so. This appears to be based on an assumption that statewide bodies would have to travel greater distances to be physically present at a meeting.
Two additional issues are not addressed by the table:
- Local open meeting laws. Some states allow municipalities to establish their own rules about remote and hybrid meetings, but that information was not readily available via internet. For example, California counties often have their own open meeting laws. Local laws can be either more or less limiting than state laws.
- Differing local interpretation of state laws. In some states, the county clerk or legal counsel has considerable power with regard to interpretation of state open meeting laws, especially for official city or county boards and commissions. Many PC/PBs hold such status. Interpretations of state law may vary considerably in different cities or counties within the same state, even though the state law is the same.
Listed by state, this table summarizes rules for remote meetings under state open meeting or “government in the sunshine” laws that apply when there is no state of emergency. The state summaries here are based on information available online about what open meetings laws – and Attorney General and court interpretations of those laws – say about the allowable use of electronic methods for holding meetings. Local open meeting laws, and differing local interpretation of state laws are not addressed here.